We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site usage. Privacy Policy

    July 21, 2026

    Neutral

    DELL & CRWD CSPs, IONQ Under Pressure, and What I'm Watching This Week

    Key Lesson: Managing Multi-Leg Stress: When Several Positions Go Wrong at Once

    Get next week's picks delivered every Tuesday.

    Get Next Week's Picks

    Market Recap

    The VIX is sitting at 17.11 this week — not screaming fear, not pricing in complacency either. That's actually a reasonably healthy zone for premium sellers: we're getting decent credit on our strikes without the market signaling that something is seriously broken underneath. SPY is holding near $748.76, and with 57% of tracked stocks above their 200-day SMA, breadth is neutral — meaning this is not a runaway bull market lifting all boats, but it's also not a distribution phase where you want to be aggressively short delta. We're in a 'pick your spots carefully' environment. Sector-wise, there are no dramatic outliers this week based on price change data, which itself tells a story: the market is in a holding pattern ahead of a massive earnings wave. Mega-cap tech and AI names like TSLA, GOOG, and TSLA all report this week, and that earnings calendar is loaded — I've excluded all of those from our candidates deliberately. The market tends to compress moves ahead of major earnings clusters and then reprice quickly after. Stay patient, focus on names that have already cleared their earnings hurdles, and let the dust settle on the big reports before committing new capital.

    Key Lesson

    Managing Multi-Leg Stress: When Several Positions Go Wrong at Once

    Looking at the open book this week, IONQ, RKLB, and IREN are all underwater simultaneously — and that's the real test of a wheel trader's discipline. The answer isn't to panic-close everything at a loss; it's to evaluate each position independently based on DTE, distance from strike, and your actual willingness to own the underlying. The habit to build right now is having your management rules written down before you enter the trade, so that when you're staring at -$951 on IONQ and -$751 on RKLB at the same time, you're executing a plan rather than reacting to emotions.

    Featured Trade Analysis

    $MARA

    I closed my MARA $12 CSP expiring July 24 for a +$212 gain on 4 contracts — a clean, disciplined win on a crypto-adjacent name that rewarded patience and strike selection. I immediately reloaded with a $11.5 CSP expiring August 28 at $0.52 collected, dropping the strike lower and extending duration to give myself more cushion on a name that can move violently. Right now that position is sitting at -$199 MTM, but with 38 days to expiration and a lower strike, I'm comfortable holding and letting time decay do its work.

    When you close a winner and redeploy on the same ticker, step your strike down to reflect any new risk environment — don't just copy the same trade blindly.

    $SPCX

    My SPCX $105 CSP expiring August 21 was opened with an IVR of 91% — that's exactly the kind of elevated implied volatility environment where I want to be a premium seller, not a buyer. I collected $4.30 and the position is nearly flat at -$13 MTM with 31 days left, which is about as good as you can ask for this early in the cycle. The high IVR entry gives me a significant edge if volatility contracts, which tends to happen once whatever elevated-fear event triggered that IVR resolves.

    Entering CSPs when IVR is above 80% is one of the highest-probability setups you can find — IV contraction works in your favor on top of theta decay.

    $IONQ

    IONQ is my most painful open position right now — the $45 CSP expiring August 21 is sitting at -$951 MTM, which is a significant drawdown on a single-contract trade. I actually already closed a previous IONQ $45 CSP expiring July 31 for +$165, so I have some realized gains on this name, but the current position is clearly underwater and needs to be watched closely. Quantum computing stocks are high-beta, high-narrative names and IONQ can move 20-30% in a week; I sized at 1 contract intentionally because of that risk profile, and that position sizing discipline is the only reason this isn't a portfolio-threatening situation.

    On speculative high-volatility tickers like IONQ, 1-contract sizing isn't timidity — it's the risk management that lets you stay in the game when the trade goes against you.

    $RKLB

    The RKLB $75 CSP expiring August 14 collected $3.07 but is currently at -$751 MTM — another high-growth aerospace/space name that has moved against me this cycle. RKLB is a story stock with significant retail and institutional momentum, but story stocks can reprice rapidly when sentiment shifts. With 24 days to expiration and the position deep in the red, I'm watching the $75 strike level closely and will need to decide soon whether to roll down and out or accept assignment if the thesis on the business remains intact.

    High-premium story stocks feel attractive at entry, but always have a pre-defined plan for what you'll do if the stock breaches your strike — assignment, roll, or take the loss.

    $GOLD

    My GOLD $40 CSP expiring August 21 was entered at a 52% IVR and collected $1.27, and it's only -$113 MTM — a manageable situation on a gold miner that I genuinely wouldn't mind owning at $40. Barrick Gold has been benefiting from elevated gold prices, and selling a put at $40 gives me a reasonable cost basis if assigned. This one is a lower-stress position compared to IONQ and RKLB because the underlying is a large-cap commodity company rather than a speculative growth name.

    Selling CSPs on commodity names you'd genuinely be comfortable owning changes your psychological relationship with the trade — you're not just hoping for expiration, you have a real floor thesis.

    $IREN

    The IREN $47 CSP expiring July 24 is the most time-sensitive position in the book right now — 3 days to expiration and sitting at -$363 MTM on $1.77 collected, which means the stock has moved below my strike meaningfully. With only 3 days left, theta is accelerating, but so is the pressure if IREN stays below $47 heading into expiration. I'll be watching this one daily and deciding by Thursday whether to close it for a defined loss, let it expire and take assignment, or roll it out if I can capture a credit.

    When a CSP enters its final week with the stock below your strike, you only have three real choices — close, roll, or accept assignment — and you need to know which one you're choosing before expiration Friday.

    $IONQ

    The closed IONQ $45 CSP expiring July 31 landed at +$165 — a profitable outcome that was captured by closing before expiration to lock in gains and free up capital. This is the sister trade to my current open IONQ position, and it's a good reminder that the same ticker, same strike, and different expiration cycle can produce very different outcomes depending on market conditions at the time. The discipline to take the win early on the July cycle while the August cycle is struggling underscores why I run these as separate, independent positions.

    Treat each expiration cycle as its own independent trade — a win in one cycle doesn't mean you carry risk expectations over to the next.

    $MARA

    The closed MARA $12 CSP expiring July 24 produced +$212 across 4 contracts — a solid winner that benefited from Bitcoin-correlated volatility settling down during the holding period. I sized this at 4 contracts because MARA is a lower-priced stock and the per-contract notional is smaller, which allowed me to maintain reasonable overall position sizing while still generating meaningful premium. The successful close gave me both realized P&L and the confidence to reload at a lower strike for the next cycle.

    On lower-priced, high-volatility tickers, scaling up contract count modestly can make the premium meaningful without violating your overall portfolio risk rules — just be honest about total notional exposure.

    IV Environment

    IV is in a quiet but not dead zone this week, with VIX at 17.11 — premiums are available but you're not going to find the 80th-percentile IVR setups on every ticker. The most notable IV outlier in our CSP candidates is DELL at 83% IVR, which stands out as genuinely elevated relative to its own history and warrants attention. With no major IV spikes flagged across the broader watchlist this week, the focus shifts to selectivity: find the pockets of elevated IV like DELL and DDOG rather than chasing mediocre premiums on flat-IV names.

    Top Cash-Secured Put Candidates

    TickerStrikeExpiryPremiumIV RankAnn ROCRationale
    $DELL$350Aug 21$16.028354%DELL's 83% IVR with a 54% annualized ROC at the $350 strike gives us exceptional premium in an AI infrastructure name that is up 98.5% over 90 days and has analyst buy consensus with a 23% price target upside — a high-quality setup if you're comfortable with the beta.
    $CRWD$172.5Aug 21$5.955841%CrowdStrike at a $172.5 strike offers a 41% annualized ROC with IVR at 58% on a cybersecurity leader that has surged 12.3% in the last 30 days and sits comfortably above both its 200 and 50-day SMAs, giving solid technical and fundamental support to the put.
    $UAL$110Aug 21$3.086233%United Airlines at the $110 strike delivers a 33% annualized ROC with IVR at 62%, and with the stock above both key moving averages and up 19.2% over 90 days, we're selling premium into a name with real cyclical recovery momentum at a strike that offers meaningful downside buffer.
    $CSCO$100Aug 21$2.36527%Cisco at the $100 strike is the most conservative pick this week — IVR 65%, annROC 27%, and a beta of just 1.01 makes this a lower-stress premium collection trade, though the fact that CSCO is below its 50-day SMA warrants sizing down and treating this as a defined-risk, quality-company play rather than a high-conviction directional bet.

    Top Covered Call Candidates

    TickerStrikeExpiryPremiumIV RankAnn ROCRationale
    $DDOG$310Aug 21$8.97934%Datadog's $310 call at 79% IVR and a 104% IV/HV ratio signals that options are pricing in far more movement than the stock has actually been delivering, making this a textbook IV overpricing setup for covered call sellers looking for 34% annualized ROC on a cloud monitoring leader.
    $PANW$390Aug 21$10.286131%Palo Alto Networks has ripped 18.5% in 30 days and 97.2% over 90 days, making the $390 covered call at 31% annualized ROC an attractive way to harvest premium against extended upside gains while maintaining a bullish core position in one of the strongest cybersecurity franchises in the market.
    $CVS$120Aug 21$1.436215%CVS at the $120 call with a 91% IV/HV ratio and IVR of 62% is the income-focused, low-beta covered call of the week — annROC of 14% is modest, but with a beta of 0.60 and RSI approaching 69 suggesting the stock may be nearing short-term overbought territory, selling the call here is a disciplined way to cap upside and collect on elevated implied volatility.
    $SNOW$310Aug 21$74528%Snowflake's $310 covered call at 27% annualized ROC is the most balanced risk/reward CC on the list this week — IVR at 45% is the lowest of the group, but a 65.5% IV/HV ratio, strong 90-day momentum of 82.2%, and RSI of 68 suggest the stock has run meaningfully and selling a call 27% annualized is reasonable compensation for capping further near-term appreciation.

    Quick Tips This Week

    • With VIX at 17 and a massive earnings calendar running through July 28, avoid opening new CSPs or CCs on any stock reporting in the next 10 days — even if the premium looks attractive, the binary earnings gap risk simply isn't compensated by the credit you're collecting.
    • In a neutral breadth environment where only 57% of stocks are above their 200-day SMA, focus your new positions on names that are clearly above both their 200 and 50-day SMAs — those technical filters do real work in separating strong underlying trends from weak ones that look cheap for a reason.
    • At VIX 17, premium is decent but not exceptional — prioritize quality of setup over quantity of trades, and if you can't find a ticker with IVR above 50% that also clears your technical and fundamental filters, it's perfectly acceptable to sit on your hands and wait for better conditions.

    The trades that build lasting accounts aren't the ones that go perfectly — they're the ones you managed correctly when they didn't.

    Trade logically,

    James

    Founder, Option Wheel Logic

    Get next week's picks delivered every Tuesday.

    Get Next Week's Picks

    Disclaimer: This newsletter is AI-assisted market commentary for informational and educational purposes only. It is not financial advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Option Wheel Logic is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or licensed financial professional.

    Options trading involves significant risk, including the potential loss of the entire amount invested. Strategies such as cash-secured puts and covered calls may result in assignment of shares or missed upside. Past performance of any strategy or ticker mentioned is not indicative of future results. All data, strikes, premiums, and IV figures are sourced from third-party providers and may be delayed or inaccurate – always verify with your broker before placing any trade.

    Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions. By using this site you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for your own trading decisions.